Landmark consultation on governance reform in rugby launched
A nationwide consultation seeking views from across the rugby community to modernise the way the game is governed in England has been launched.
The consultation is a crucial next step in the work of the Governance and Representation Review Group, chaired by Malcolm Wharton CBE, which was set up last year.
In the first phase of its work, the group has spent the past year conducting an extensive fact-finding process to understand how the game can better reflect the voices of those who play, run, and support rugby.
It has reviewed previous consultation findings, used insight from the National Rugby Survey, undertaken a series of focus groups, surveyed RFU Council Members and held interviews with a wide range of stakeholders, as well as looking at other Unions and their governing models and membership organisations.
Key issues identified for rugby during this process were:
-
Overly complex and slow decision-making
-
Lack of transparency and communication
-
Insufficient representation and diversity
-
Ambiguity in roles between the Board and Council
-
High administrative burden on volunteers
Following this work, the consultation suggests a variety of governance changes, led by the principle of embedding and strengthening the voice of the game within the RFU and modernising rugby’s governance and decision-making structures.
It puts forward a range of core principles and options for the future while inviting other ideas and insights. Options set out by Wharton’s group include replacing the current 63 person RFU Council in its current form and replacing it with a smaller national advisory group or replacing those members with game representatives who would be embedded within all the decision-making bodies, including in suggested Regional Growth Boards.
Suggestions also include proposals to enhance areas like volunteer development, and accelerating ideas to develop a genuinely devolved regional system so those in the game can feel closer to and can influence the decisions which impact them directly.
The consultation will run from 30 April to 30 June 2025 during which time the Review Group is inviting views from clubs, players, coaches, volunteers, administrators, and anyone passionate about the game.
Malcolm Wharton CBE, Chair of the Governance and Representation Review Group, said: “This review represents an opportunity for real change. We want to work with the game to identify a progressive, inclusive, agile and local approach to governance, where we can deliver greater transparency built on a culture of shared ownership so rugby can thrive across the country.”
Additional background:
-
The RFU is required to review its governance structure at least every five years. The RFU Governance and Representation Review Group was set up in 2024 to do this. Details on the full group.
-
Once the game consultation is finished, the group will report to the RFU Council with a final report and set of recommendations.
-
In the coming weeks a series of webinars and wider online sessions will be advertised and held for anyone to come and hear from the group who have put the consultation together and to ask any question.
FAQs
The RFU is required to review its governance structure at least every five years. Given the rapid changes in the sporting environment and consistent concerns from members, this review is both timely and essential to ensure the RFU remains effective, transparent, and inclusive.
The Chair was selected by the RFU’s Council Nominations Committee following the role being advertised to Past Presidents and Distinguished Members. The Council, the Board, the Executive and the National Youth Council all nominated members, and the independent members were chosen by the Chair of the Review Group together with the Council Nominations Committee. The Group was selected with a view to ensuring that there is diversity of thought and lived experience throughout.
The Council decided that the Group should not be fully independent but should have a significant amount of independent input into the Group. Since starting its work, the Group has added further independence to its membership.
Since the group was established in 2024 it has reviewed previous consultation findings, the National Rugby Survey 2021/22, undertaken focus groups, surveyed RFU Council Members and held interviews with a wide range of stakeholders. More information is set out in the appendices published alongside the consultation document.
- Overly complex and slow decision-making
- Lack of transparency and communication
- Insufficient representation and diversity
- Ambiguity in roles between the Board and Council
- High administrative burden on volunteers
The review proposes stronger mechanisms for direct consultation with members and opening up roles traditionally reserved for the RFU Council to a broader pool of people across the game.
The Board's role would be clarified to focus on strategic oversight, with a mix of independent professionals and game-experienced directors. It will remain the primary decision-making body.
Option 1: Remove the current Council and embed skilled game representatives into all decision-making bodies.
Option 2: Establish a smaller national advisory group to support the Board, along with embedded regional game representatives.
The review supports the idea that decisions should be made at the most appropriate level — national, regional, or local — to improve efficiency and relevance.
These new regional bodies would:
- Develop local growth plans
- Manage devolved funding
- Reflect local needs
- Attract new investment
- Include local experts
There is a proposal to clarify and expand local control over competitions, including potential future devolution of women’s competitions to align with men’s structures.
Plans include:
- Open advertising of all volunteer roles
- Clear development pathways
- Use of a national volunteer talent bank
- Annual performance reviews
- Continued professional development (CPD) opportunities
The Group will review the responses to the consultation over the summer and will develop firm proposals. These will be discussed with the Board and put to Council for their approval. If constitutional changes are agreed, these would then be put to members.
This depends on what is agreed and further discussions. The Group will work with the Board and Council to establish a transition plan, which could include how responsibility shifts to any new bodies, and the extent to which people currently in post remain in post for a period of time.
These are not final recommendations, and the RFU is keen to hear a range of views and ideas. Any new structure would have to deliver changes to the decision-making, ensuring that there is a much clearer way in which the voices of members and participants are heard directly by those making decisions.
The accountability of the Board will be with members directly – they would have the power to appoint and remove directors, including the chair. On a more regular basis, an assessment of the effectiveness of the Board would take place every year and this would be reported to the members. There would also be more regular communication and consultation, so members could more directly see the decisions being made.